ÃÑ 694ÆäÀÌÁö

573ÆäÀÌÁö º»¹®½ÃÀÛ

´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿ì¸®´Â Clavibacter californiensis sp.ÀÇ ¼³¸³À» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú
½À´Ï´Ù. 11¿ù À¯Çü ±ÕÁÖ C55T(=CFBP 8216T=ATCC BAA-2691T)¸¦ °®´Â Á¾À¸·Î ºÐ·ù
µË´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À§¿¡¼­ ¼³¸íÇÑ »ý¹°Á¤º¸ÇÐ Àü·«°ú ÇÔ²² ÀÌÁ¾»óµ¿ ¹× in silico µµÆ® Ç÷Ô
ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis ¹× C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli
ÀÇ »ó´çÇÑ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐ¼®À» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¿ì¸®´Â µÎ ¾ÆÁ¾À» ´ÜÀÏ ºÐ
·ù±ºÀ¸·Î °áÇÕÇÏ°í Clavibacter phaseoli sp. nov.·Î Á¾ ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ½Â°Ý½Ãų °ÍÀ» Á¦¾È
ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
3. ¿ø ¹®
Elevation of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. californiensis to species level as Clavibacter
californiensis sp. nov., merging and re-classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp.
chilensis and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. phaseoli as Clavibacter phaseoli sp. nov. based
on complete genome in silico analyses
Dario Arizala?, Shefali Dobhal, Anne M. Alvarez? and Mohammad Arif
The Gram-positive genus Clavibacter is currently divided into seven species ( Clavibacter
michiganensis , Clavibacter nebraskensis , Clavibacter capsici , Clavibacter sepedonicus ,
Clavibacter tessellarius , Clavibacter insidiosus and Clavibacter zhangzhiyongii ) and three
subspecies ( C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis , C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis and C.
michiganensis subsp. phaseoli ). Recent studies have indicated that the taxonomic rank of the
subspecies must be re-evaluated. In this research, we assessed the taxonomic position of the
three C. michiganensis subspecies and clarified the taxonomic nomenclature of other 75
Clavibacter strains. The complete genomes of the type strains of the three Clavibacter
subspecies, the type strain of C. tessellarius and C. nebraskensis A6096 were sequenced using
PacBio RSII technology. Application of whole-genome-based computational approaches such as
average nucleotide identity (ANI), digital DNA?DNA hybridization, multi-locus sequence analysis
of seven housekeeping genes (acnA, atpD, bipA, icdA, mtlD, recA and rpoB), a phylogenomic
tree reconstructed from 1?028 core genes, and ANI-based phylogeny provided sufficient
justification for raising C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis to the species level. These
results led us to propose the establishment of Clavibacter californiensis sp. nov. as a species
with its type strain C55T (=CFBP 8216T=ATCC BAA-2691T). Moreover, the orthologous and in
silico dot plot analyses, along with the above described bioinformatic strategies, revealed a
high degree of similarity between C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis and C. michiganensis
subsp. phaseoli . Based on these analyses, we propose that both subspecies be combined into
a single taxon and elevated to the species level as Clavibacter phaseoli sp. nov., with LPPA
982T (=?CECT 8144T=?LMG 27667T) as the type strain.
- 574 -

573ÆäÀÌÁö º»¹®³¡



ÇöÀç Æ÷Ä¿½ºÀÇ ¾Æ·¡³»¿ëµéÀº µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÄÁÅÙÃ÷¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÆäÀÌÁö³Ñ±è È¿°ú¹× ½Ã°¢Àû È¿°ú¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÆäÀÌÁöÀ̹ǷΠ½ºÅ©¸°¸®´õ »ç¿ëÀÚ´Â ¿©±â±îÁö¸¸ ³¶µ¶ÇϽðí À§ÀÇ ÆäÀÌÁöÀ̵¿ ¸µÅ©¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ÆäÀÌÁö·Î À̵¿ÇϽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
»ó´Ü¸Þ´º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ´ÜÃàÅ°¾È³» : ÀÌÀüÆäÀÌÁö´Â ÁÂÃø¹æÇâÅ°, ´ÙÀ½ÆäÀÌÁö´Â ¿ìÃø¹æÇâÅ°, ùÆäÀÌÁö´Â »ó´Ü¹æÇâÅ°, ¸¶Áö¸·ÆäÀÌÁö´Â ÇϴܹæÇâÅ°, ÁÂÃøÈ®´ëÃà¼Ò´Â insertÅ°, ¿ìÃøÈ®´ëÃà¼Ò´Â deleteÅ°