총 658페이지
617페이지 본문시작
around biosecurity outbreaks could help unify Australia’s standards and provide a stronger
foundation for engaging in international policy discussions.
International relationships will be equally important; assisting with pre-border intelligence
gathering, knowledge sharing, and enabling safe and open trade flows. Australia’s strong
dependence on international supply chains and the lack of transparency within them can
challenge biosecurity preparedness efforts and impede Australia’s ability to accurately
understand the risks imposed by a given incoming product. Additionally, trade is often
favoured over strong biosecurity,and imported foods and goods can present significant and
growing biosecurity risk. For example, in the case of uncooked prawn imports and the
outbreak of white spot disease in 2016, the event highlighted longstanding issues with
import conditions and serious non-compliance by some major importers.
Case Study 2: Co-design of biosecurity strategies
The Queensland Biosecurity Strategy 2018?2023 was co-developed by the Queensland
Government, industry, community and other partners across the biosecurity system.
Partners from across the system created the strategy from the ground up,creating buy-in
and fostering shared responsibility. The strategy was developed through iteration with over
30 organisations and a joint government-industry writing group,creating strategic themes
and providing guidance for future action plans.
Recommendationsforimprovingdomesticandinternationalpartnerships
4. Develop stronger partnerships within the national system to bolster shared responsibility
This could include more co-design and co-ownership of biosecurity strategies and priorities,
emergency response plans, and cost sharing arrangements between government, industry
and local community champions (see Case Study 2). This would help ensure that these
tools meet the imperatives of all stakeholders. In particular, biosecurity risk creators
(stakeholders who increase risks of a pest or disease incurring or amplify its impact)such
as cargo owners/importers,incoming vessels etc.,could be better engaged in the system to
drive shared responsibility. Alongside increasing engagement with these groups, continued
review, assessment and introduction of appropriate fee structures for risk creators across
the supply chain could help create a sustainable funding source for the required level of
biosecurity activities. This could include further consideration of the biosecurity imports
levy structure to ensure buy-in and value from industry stakeholders.
5. Strengthen relationships with international counterparts and partners
International relationships can be used to bolster Australia’s biosecurity capability and
- 617 -
foundation for engaging in international policy discussions.
International relationships will be equally important; assisting with pre-border intelligence
gathering, knowledge sharing, and enabling safe and open trade flows. Australia’s strong
dependence on international supply chains and the lack of transparency within them can
challenge biosecurity preparedness efforts and impede Australia’s ability to accurately
understand the risks imposed by a given incoming product. Additionally, trade is often
favoured over strong biosecurity,and imported foods and goods can present significant and
growing biosecurity risk. For example, in the case of uncooked prawn imports and the
outbreak of white spot disease in 2016, the event highlighted longstanding issues with
import conditions and serious non-compliance by some major importers.
Case Study 2: Co-design of biosecurity strategies
The Queensland Biosecurity Strategy 2018?2023 was co-developed by the Queensland
Government, industry, community and other partners across the biosecurity system.
Partners from across the system created the strategy from the ground up,creating buy-in
and fostering shared responsibility. The strategy was developed through iteration with over
30 organisations and a joint government-industry writing group,creating strategic themes
and providing guidance for future action plans.
Recommendationsforimprovingdomesticandinternationalpartnerships
4. Develop stronger partnerships within the national system to bolster shared responsibility
This could include more co-design and co-ownership of biosecurity strategies and priorities,
emergency response plans, and cost sharing arrangements between government, industry
and local community champions (see Case Study 2). This would help ensure that these
tools meet the imperatives of all stakeholders. In particular, biosecurity risk creators
(stakeholders who increase risks of a pest or disease incurring or amplify its impact)such
as cargo owners/importers,incoming vessels etc.,could be better engaged in the system to
drive shared responsibility. Alongside increasing engagement with these groups, continued
review, assessment and introduction of appropriate fee structures for risk creators across
the supply chain could help create a sustainable funding source for the required level of
biosecurity activities. This could include further consideration of the biosecurity imports
levy structure to ensure buy-in and value from industry stakeholders.
5. Strengthen relationships with international counterparts and partners
International relationships can be used to bolster Australia’s biosecurity capability and
- 617 -
617페이지 본문끝
메뉴
현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.