총 875페이지
875페이지 본문시작
Tuli Block farmers said large volumes remained unsold, resulting in losses for commercial
growers. The situation has also prompted responses from farming organisations outside
Botswana, particularly in South Africa, where the restriction has been criticised as a return to
earlier trade measures.
The Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa has described the restriction as a
reinstatement of the 2021 ban and a policy reversal by Botswana's current administration.
Agbiz chief economist Wandile Sihlobo stated that the move contradicts earlier decisions to lift
similar measures. The organisation has also argued that the restriction violates the Southern
African Customs Union free trade framework.
"We continuously see countries restricting imports of agricultural products on short notice,
with limited communication to other countries," Sihlobo said. "They blocked South Africa's
vegetable imports in 2021 and at various points in subsequent years."
"The Southern African Customs Union bloc promotes free trade and economic integration.
Nevertheless, the SACU agreement contains a loophole that allows such restrictions.... Of
course, this action has had a financial impact on South African farmers, who have for many
years produced for the domestic market and the region at large," Sihlobo said.
Sihlobo added that South Africa's response should be "sensitive but firm" and said restrictions
should have time limits once Botswana's producers can compete in open markets.
Within Botswana, views differ. Duncan Ramooki of the Mosisedi commercial farmers association
said consultation with South African producers was not required. "It's not necessary for the
government to have engaged with SA producers and the government. This is not even a ban,
it's a seasonal restriction that is the result of excessive supply from local producers," he said.
Ramooki added that the government has a responsibility to manage domestic supply and
demand and support local producers. The 2021 ban on 16 vegetables was accompanied by
public investment in boreholes, shade nets, and tunnels. While production increased,
challenges emerged around pricing and quality.
Vice President and Minister of Finance Ndaba Gaolathe later criticised the earlier ban in
Parliament. "I put it to you that a vegetable ban is bad economics, very bad economics," he
said, warning of higher food costs and impacts on low-income households. He suggested
alternatives, including targeted subsidies, research and development, and farmer mentorship
rather than import bans.
- 875 -
growers. The situation has also prompted responses from farming organisations outside
Botswana, particularly in South Africa, where the restriction has been criticised as a return to
earlier trade measures.
The Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa has described the restriction as a
reinstatement of the 2021 ban and a policy reversal by Botswana's current administration.
Agbiz chief economist Wandile Sihlobo stated that the move contradicts earlier decisions to lift
similar measures. The organisation has also argued that the restriction violates the Southern
African Customs Union free trade framework.
"We continuously see countries restricting imports of agricultural products on short notice,
with limited communication to other countries," Sihlobo said. "They blocked South Africa's
vegetable imports in 2021 and at various points in subsequent years."
"The Southern African Customs Union bloc promotes free trade and economic integration.
Nevertheless, the SACU agreement contains a loophole that allows such restrictions.... Of
course, this action has had a financial impact on South African farmers, who have for many
years produced for the domestic market and the region at large," Sihlobo said.
Sihlobo added that South Africa's response should be "sensitive but firm" and said restrictions
should have time limits once Botswana's producers can compete in open markets.
Within Botswana, views differ. Duncan Ramooki of the Mosisedi commercial farmers association
said consultation with South African producers was not required. "It's not necessary for the
government to have engaged with SA producers and the government. This is not even a ban,
it's a seasonal restriction that is the result of excessive supply from local producers," he said.
Ramooki added that the government has a responsibility to manage domestic supply and
demand and support local producers. The 2021 ban on 16 vegetables was accompanied by
public investment in boreholes, shade nets, and tunnels. While production increased,
challenges emerged around pricing and quality.
Vice President and Minister of Finance Ndaba Gaolathe later criticised the earlier ban in
Parliament. "I put it to you that a vegetable ban is bad economics, very bad economics," he
said, warning of higher food costs and impacts on low-income households. He suggested
alternatives, including targeted subsidies, research and development, and farmer mentorship
rather than import bans.
- 875 -
875페이지 본문끝
메뉴
현재 포커스의 아래내용들은 동일한 컨텐츠를 가지고 페이지넘김 효과및 시각적 효과를 제공하는 페이지이므로 스크린리더 사용자는 여기까지만 낭독하시고 위의 페이지이동 링크를 사용하여 다음페이지로 이동하시기 바랍니다.